Crite v. Hatfield ( 1998 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6270
JOHN RICKIE CRITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN B. HATFIELD, JR.; STEVE COLE; RICK J.
MCCURRY; W. P. RIGGS, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
District Judge. (CA-96-818-2)
Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998
Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Rickie Crite, Appellant Pro Se. John B. Hatfield, Jr.,
HATFIELD & HATFIELD, Greensboro, North Carolina; Debra C. Graves,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Caro-
lina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying him
relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986 (1994) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, deny
Appellant’s motion to appoint counsel, and deny Appellant’s motion
to stay the case. Crite v. Hatfield, No. CA-96-818-2 (M.D.N.C. Jan.
29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2