Mukasa v. Mukasey , 322 F. App'x 3 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                    Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the First Circuit
    No. 08-1875
    SUSAN N. MUKASA,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,*
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
    Respondent.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF
    THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS
    Before
    Lynch, Chief Judge,
    Farris** and Howard, Circuit Judges.
    William P. Joyce and Joyce & Associates, P.C. were on brief
    for appellant.
    Anthony Wray Norwood, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration
    Litigation, Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, and
    Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration
    Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, were on brief for appellee.
    April 23, 2009
    *
    Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), Attorney General Eric
    H. Holder, Jr. has been substituted for former Attorney General
    Michael B. Mukasey as respondent.
    **
    Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    FARRIS, Circuit Judge.     Susan Mukasa, a native and
    citizen of Uganda, petitions for review of an order by the Board of
    Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen her removal
    proceedings. Mukasa entered the United States on December 25, 2000
    using a false passport.
    She applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and
    protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture, all
    of which were denied. In moving to reopen, Mukasa asserted changed
    country conditions and offered additional evidence.
    We review the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen for
    abuse of discretion. Guerrero-Santana v. Gonzales, 
    499 F.3d 90
    , 92
    (1st Cir. 2007).    Under this standard, the Board’s decision will
    stand unless the petitioner can show that it rests on an error of
    law or that it is patently arbitrary.     
    Id. at 93
    .
    We have carefully reviewed the record along with Mukasa’s
    new allegations.    She fails to challenge the adverse credibility
    finding.    Her motion to reopen does nothing to rehabilitate the
    finding that her testimony was not credible, nor does it present a
    distinct new claim.
    AFFIRMED.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1875

Citation Numbers: 322 F. App'x 3

Judges: Farris, Howard, Lynch

Filed Date: 4/23/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023