Kenta v. Oregon State Penitentiary , 96 Or. App. 755 ( 1989 )

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He first contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the $100 fine is unlawful. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.