Erickson v. Kalman , 291 Minn. 41 ( 1971 )

Peterson, Justice

(dissenting in part, concurring in part).

I concur in the statement of law expressed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Kelly and, for the reasons stated by him, would affirm the trial court with respect to the contested accounts in the Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Federal Savings and Loan Association. I concur with the majority in reversing as to the small account in the First Bloomington Lake National Bank, for in my view the statutory presumption was clearly rebutted by the evidence that it was established and used as a joint account solely for convenience.