Gottfried, Inc. v. Paulette Koch Real Estate , 778 So. 2d 1089 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  • 778 So. 2d 1089 (2001)

    MARTHA A. GOTTFRIED, INC., Appellant,
    v.
    PAULETTE KOCH REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida corporation, Paulette Koch, Paul J. Kozloff, Paul J. Kozloff, Trustee of the Banyan Road Revocable Trust, and John Doe and Jane Doe, Appellees.

    No. 4D00-3354.

    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

    March 7, 2001.

    Freeman W. Barner, Jr. of Watterson, Hyland & Klett, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.

    Susan B. Yoffee of Fleming, Haile & Shaw, P.A., North Palm Beach, for Appellees-Paulette Koch Real Estate Inc. and Paulette Koch.

    PER CURIAM.

    Martha Gottfried, Inc. (Gottfried) appeals a non-final order compelling arbitration *1090 in its dispute with Paulette Koch Real Estate, Inc. over a real estate commission. We affirm.

    Gottfried contends that it has not agreed to arbitrate this dispute and should not be bound by the agreement of its broker, Pamela Hoffpauer, to submit the claim to arbitration by virtue of her application for membership with the Palm Beach Board of Realtors.

    Arbitration is a preferred method of dispute resolution; therefore, any doubt regarding the scope of an arbitration clause should be resolved in favor of arbitration. See Roe v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co., 533 So. 2d 279 (Fla.1988); Nestler-Poletto Realty, Inc. v. Kassin, 730 So. 2d 324, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Ronbeck Constr. Co. v. Savanna Club Corp., 592 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

    Non-signatories may be bound by an arbitration agreement if dictated by ordinary principles of contract law and agency. See, e.g., Thomson-CSF, S.A. v. American Arbitration Ass'n, 64 F.3d 773, 776 (2d Cir.1995). Furthermore, a third party beneficiary to a contract can be compelled to arbitrate. See Terminix Int'l Co. LP v. Ponzio, 693 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(citing Raffa Assocs., Inc. v. Boca Raton Resort & Club, 616 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)); Zac Smith & Co., Inc. v. Moonspinner Condo. Ass'n, 472 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Therefore, Gottfried, while not a signatory to Hoffpauer's application for membership with the Palm Beach Board of Realtors, is, nevertheless, bound by her agreement to arbitrate, as having accepted the economic and professional benefits of Hoffpauer's membership with the board. See, e.g., Proodian v. Plymouth Citrus Growers, Ass'n, 152 Fla. 684, 13 So. 2d 15 (1943); C.Q. Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., 363 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

    Accordingly, we affirm as to this and as to all other issues raised in this appeal.

    STONE, POLEN, and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: 4D00-3354

Citation Numbers: 778 So. 2d 1089

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 3/7/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2017

Cited By (13)

Juan Mendez, Jr., etc. v. Hampton Court Nursing Center, LLC. , 203 So. 3d 146 ( 2016 )

PETROLEOS MEXICANOS v. EXECUTIVE MFE AVIATION, LLC ( 2021 )

Palm Garden v. Haydu , 209 So. 3d 636 ( 2017 )

ALTERRA HEALTHCARE v. Estate of Linton Ex Rel. Graham , 953 So. 2d 574 ( 2007 )

BallenIsles Country Club, Inc. v. Dexter Realty , 24 So. 3d 649 ( 2009 )

International Bullion and Metal Brokers, Inc. v. WEST ... , 846 So. 2d 1276 ( 2003 )

Shea v. Global Travel Marketing, Inc. , 870 So. 2d 20 ( 2003 )

Deloitte & Touche v. GENCOR INDUSTRIES , 929 So. 2d 678 ( 2006 )

Johnson v. Pires , 968 So. 2d 700 ( 2007 )

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ortiz , 931 So. 2d 1025 ( 2006 )

Stalley v. Transitional Hospitals Corp. of Tampa , 44 So. 3d 627 ( 2010 )

Moen v. Bradenton Council on Aging, LLC , 210 So. 3d 213 ( 2017 )

Hirshenson v. Spaccio , 800 So. 2d 670 ( 2001 )

View All Citing Opinions »