Tennis v. General Motors Corp. , 625 S.W.2d 218 ( 1981 )

PREWITT, Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the principal opinion except for the comments regarding the brief of plaintiff-appellant. I do not read Rule 84.-04 as prohibiting additional contents in an appellant’s brief, nor as specifying the sequence of its essential parts. I believe that reasonable additions may be made to a brief consistent with its purpose and that the additions here were reasonable. For a brief with five main points, divided into fifteen subpoints, the case citations were neither unusual nor excessive.