-
Rogosheske, Justice (concurring specially).
I concur in the result. There is evidentiary support for an inference that the employee was exposed to a different and greater risk than if he had been pursuing his ordinary personal affairs. Here the environment of the occasion — the stress of persuading a prospective customer, to please him, and to make him more receptive — is a different circumstance than the ordinary leisurely consumption of an evening meal. The employee was discussing business at the time he choked. It was a late dinner commencing at 7:30 and the order had not yet been obtained.
*389 While it may be that such choking occurs from bad eating habits, it is not unreasonable for a factfinder to conclude that the stress and tension of making a sale caused the employee to lapse into the type of careless eating habits which caused his choking.
Document Info
Docket Number: 40230
Citation Numbers: 152 N.W.2d 743, 277 Minn. 376
Judges: Knutson, Nelson, Otis, Peterson, Rogosheske
Filed Date: 8/11/1967
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/24/2023