Colter v. State , 297 Md. 423 ( 1983 )

Eldridge, J.,

concurring:

I agree with the Court’s opinion that this case is distinguishable from Taliaferro v. State, 295 Md. 376, 456 A.2d 29, cert. denied, U.S. , 103 S.Ct. 2114, 77 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1983), and that, under the principles set forth by the majority in Taliaferro, the conviction in this case must be overturned. Nevertheless, for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in the Taliaferro case, 295 Md. at 393-409, I believe that the Court’s opinion in Taliaferro should be overruled.

Judges Cole and Davidson have authorized me to state that they concur with the views expressed herein.