-
PAPADAKOS, Justice, concurring.
I join the Majority opinion but write separately to add a point of clarification concerning Kathleen Williams’ contention that the jury returned inconsistent answers to the interrogatories it was given. Since this issue was not properly raised and preserved, it is beyond our scope of review and we cannot reach the merits. Reilly by Reilly v. SEPTA, 507 Pa. 204, 489 A.2d 1291 (1985). Accordingly, I do not read the majority to be saying that inconsistent questions were given to the jury or that it returned inconsistent answers.
Document Info
Docket Number: 22 and 131 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Citation Numbers: 633 A.2d 1090, 534 Pa. 467
Judges: Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Filed Date: 11/3/1993
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/26/2023