Philadelphia Police Dept. v. Gray , 534 Pa. 467 ( 1993 )


Menu:
  • PAPADAKOS, Justice,

    concurring.

    I join the Majority opinion but write separately to add a point of clarification concerning Kathleen Williams’ contention that the jury returned inconsistent answers to the interrogatories it was given. Since this issue was not properly raised and preserved, it is beyond our scope of review and we cannot reach the merits. Reilly by Reilly v. SEPTA, 507 Pa. 204, 489 A.2d 1291 (1985). Accordingly, I do not read the majority to be saying that inconsistent questions were given to the jury or that it returned inconsistent answers.

Document Info

Docket Number: 22 and 131 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991

Citation Numbers: 633 A.2d 1090, 534 Pa. 467

Judges: Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Filed Date: 11/3/1993

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/26/2023