Goins v. Pineda ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Goins v. Pineda, 
    128 Ohio St. 3d 358
    , 2011-Ohio-529.]
    GOINS, APPELLANT, v. PINEDA, WARDEN, APPELLEE.
    [Cite as Goins v. Pineda, 
    128 Ohio St. 3d 358
    , 2011-Ohio-529.]
    Subsequent petition for habeas corpus relief — Res judicata bars a second
    petition — Judgment affirmed.
    (No. 2010-1736 — Submitted February 2, 2011 — Decided February 9, 2011.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hocking County, No. 09CA5.
    __________________
    Per Curiam.
    {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion
    of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas
    corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to
    raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State
    ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 
    126 Ohio St. 3d 480
    , 2010-Ohio-4387, 
    935 N.E.2d 38
    , ¶
    1.1
    Judgment affirmed.
    O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
    LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
    __________________
    Dana Goins, pro se.
    Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and M. Scott Criss, Assistant
    Attorney General, for appellee.
    ______________________
    1. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-1736

Judges: O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

Filed Date: 2/9/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2024