State v. Bilka , 2012 Ohio 3924 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Bilka, 
    2012-Ohio-3924
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS
    RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    STATE OF OHIO                                     JUDGES:
    Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J.
    Plaintiff-Appellee                        Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.
    Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J.
    -vs-
    Case No. 11CA127
    DAVID BILKA
    Defendant-Appellant                       OPINION
    CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:                       Appeal from the Richland County Common
    Pleas Court, Case No. 2011CR234
    JUDGMENT:                                      Dismissed
    DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY:                        August 22, 2012
    APPEARANCES:
    For Plaintiff-Appellee                         For Defendant-Appellant
    JAMES J. MAYER, JR.                            WILLIAM C. FITHIAN, III
    PROSEUCUTING ATTORNEY                          111 N. Main Street
    RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO                          Mansfield, Ohio 44902
    BY: JOHN C. NIEFT
    Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
    38 South Park Street
    Mansfield, Ohio 44902
    Richland County, Case No. 11CA127                                                          2
    Hoffman, P.J.
    {¶1}   Defendant-appellant David Bilka appeals his criminal convictions entered
    by the Common Pleas Court of Richland County via Sentencing Entry filed on
    November 10, 2011. The state of Ohio is plaintiff-appellee.
    STATE OF THE CASE1
    {¶2}   Appellant was indicted on four counts: Count I, Burglary with a forfeiture
    specification; Count II, Breaking and Entering with a forfeiture specification; Count III,
    Receiving Stolen Property with a forfeiture specification; and Count IV, Safecracking
    with a forfeiture specification. Appellant pled not guilty to the charges and the case
    proceeded to jury trial.
    {¶3}   During closing argument, the prosecutor stated:
    {¶4}   “Now, I told you that I was going to probably just get rid of the breaking
    and entering charge. After discussing that with counsel and the Court, we’ve decided to
    let you decide” Transcript at p. 319.         Following closing arguments, the trial court
    instructed the jury on the elements of all four counts and also how to complete the
    verdict forms for all four counts.
    {¶5}   The jury returned executed guilty verdict forms for Counts I, III, and IV and
    the forfeiture specification. The jury did not return a verdict form on Count II, Breaking
    and Entering. The jury was discharged with no mention being made by anyone as to
    Count II.
    {¶6}   At the sentencing hearing held on November 9, 2011, the trial court
    stated:
    1
    A rendition of the facts is unnecessary for our disposition of this Appeal.
    Richland County, Case No. 11CA127                                                       3
    {¶7}      “The record would indicate that the Defendant came before this Court on
    the 31st day of October, 2011, charged with four counts of felony, Counts 1 and 2 being
    charged in the alternative burglary and breaking and entering.” Transcript at p. 360.
    The trial court filed its Sentencing Entry on November 10, 2011, reflecting Appellant’s
    convictions for burglary, receiving stolen property, safecracking and the forfeiture
    specification.    No disposition was made with respect to the breaking and entering
    charge.
    {¶8}      We have reviewed the transcript.     It does not reflect the burglary and
    breaking and entering charges were charged in the alternative. As noted supra, it is
    clear Appellee desired the jury reach a verdict on that charge.
    {¶9}      While we recognize had the jury convicted Appellant on Count II, it would
    likely to have been merged with Count I, the fact remains there has been no verdict nor
    other disposition of Count II. Accordingly, we find no final appealable order exists and
    this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain Appellant’s appeal at this time.
    By: Hoffman, P.J.
    Farmer, J. and
    Edwards, J. concur
    s/ William B. Hoffman _________________
    HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
    s/ Sheila G. Farmer __________________
    HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
    s/ Julie A. Edwards___________________
    HON. JULIE A. EDWARDS
    Richland County, Case No. 11CA127                                                  4
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    STATE OF OHIO                              :
    :
    Plaintiff-Appellee                  :
    :
    -vs-                                       :         JUDGMENT ENTRY
    :
    DAVID BILKA                                :
    :
    Defendant-Appellant                 :         Case No. 11CA127
    For the reason stated in our accompanying Opinion, this appeal is ordered
    dismissed. Costs to Appellant.
    s/ William B. Hoffman _________________
    HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
    s/ Sheila G. Farmer __________________
    HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
    s/ Julie A. Edwards___________________
    HON. JULIE A. EDWARDS
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11CA127

Citation Numbers: 2012 Ohio 3924

Judges: Hoffman

Filed Date: 8/22/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014