eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Supreme Court of Oklahoma
 2015-02

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOS , 2015 OK 5 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOS
    1. Home
    2. Courts
    3. Court Dockets
    4. Legal Research
    5. Calendar
    6. Help
      
      
    1. Previous Case
    2. Top Of Index
    3. This Point in Index
    4. Citationize
    5. Next Case
    6. Print Only

    STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOS
    2015 OK 5
    Case Number: SCBD-6223
    Decided: 02/02/2015
    THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

    Cite as: 2015 OK 5, __ P.3d __

    FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION.

    STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,
    v.
    JAMES M. DEMOPOLOS, Respondent.

    ORDER OF IMMEDIATE INTERIM SUSPENSION

    ¶1 The Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA), in compliance with Rule 7.1 and 7.2 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), has forwarded to this Court certified copies of the Criminal Information, and Plea, in which James M. Demopolos entered a plea of guilty to one count of Obstructing an Officer, one count of Threatening an Act of Violence, and one count of Domestic Abuse (Assault and Battery), in violation of Okla. Stat. Tit. 21, §§ 540, 1378(B), and 644,respectively. The OBA also forwarded a certified copy of the Deferred Sentence.

    ¶2 Rule 7.3 of the RGDP provides: "Upon receipt of the certified copies of Judgment and Sentence on a plea of guilty, order deferring judgment and sentence, indictment or information and the judgment and sentence, the Supreme Court shall by order immediately suspend the lawyer from the practice of law until further order of the Court." Having received certified copies of these papers and orders, this Court orders that James M. Demopolos is immediately suspended from the practice of law. James M. Demopolos is directed to show cause, if any, no later than February 13, 2015, why this order of interim suspension should be set aside. See RGDP Rule 7.3. The OBA has until February 24, 2015, to respond to James M. Demopolos should one be filed.

    ¶3 Rule 7.2 of the RGDP provides that a certified copy of a plea of guilty, an order deferring judgment and sentence, or information and judgment and sentence of conviction "shall constitute the charge and be conclusive evidence of the commission of the crime upon which the judgment and sentence is based and shall suffice as the basis for discipline in accordance with these rules." Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the RGDP, James M. Demopolos has until March 12, 2015, to show cause in writing why a final order of discipline should not be imposed, to request a hearing, or to file a brief and any evidence tending to mitigate the severity of discipline. The OBA has until March 30, 2015, to respond.

    DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT this 2nd day of February, 2015.

    /S/CHIEF JUSTICE

    ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

    Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
    Cite Name Level
    Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
     CiteNameLevel
     2015 OK 50, STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOSCited
    Citationizer: Table of Authority
    Cite Name Level
    None Found.