David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and as Agent , 516 F.2d 1396 ( 1975 )


Menu:
  • 516 F.2d 1396

    David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v.
    CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as Agent, et al.,
    Defendants-Appellees.

    No. 1026, Docket 75-7006.

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Second Circuit.

    Submitted May 29, 1975.
    Decided May 30, 1975.

    Feldshuh, Weinberger & Derfner, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh, Donald A. Derfner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

    Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S. Simmons, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Chemical Bank, Frank Beatty, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.

    Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendant-appellee The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

    Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, for defendants-appellees Marine Midland Bank Western and Marine Midland Bank Rochester.

    Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant-appellee Lincoln First Bank of Rochester.

    Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, for defendant-appellee Union Commerce Bank.

    Before CLARK, Associate Justice,* and HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    We affirm upon Judge Bonsal's well considered opinion reported at 382 F.Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y.1974).

    *

    United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation