Anglo-California T. Co. v. Oakland Rys. , 191 Cal. 387 ( 1923 )

[1] The motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the attorney who signed the notice of appeal and prepared the transcript was not the attorney of record and that there had been no substitution of attorneys is granted on the authority of Harrigan v. Bolte, 67 Cal. xxi [8 P. 184].

On August 3, 1923, the supreme court modified the foregoing order as follows: