State, Ex Rel. v. Hobson , 135 Fla. 335 ( 1938 )

In concurring in the above opinion, which holds that the question stated is one that cannot be decided within the narrow limits of a writ of prohibition, we do not mean to intimate that the respondent Circuit Judge should proceed to take testimony to ascertain whether the State Attorney had probable cause for the filing of the information. See White v. Penton, 92 Fla. 837, 110 So. 533; State v. Vasquez,49 Fla. 126, 38 So. 830.