Van Cleve v. Wallace , 216 Minn. 500 ( 1944 )

I agree with the result solely on the ground that respondent is such an officer that when reëlected as alderman he holds over as president of the council and that it requires a majority of the members to elect his successor. Further than that I do not think we should go, or that we should overrule Justice Mitchell's sound opinion in State ex rel. Childs v. Kiichli, 53 Minn. 147, 54 N.W. 1069, 19 L.R.A. 779.