City of Edina to Use v. School District , 305 Mo. 452 ( 1924 )


Menu:
  • The foregoing opinion of SMALL, C., in Division One is adopted as the opinion of Court in Banc. Woodson, Ragland and White,JJ., concur; Graves, C.J., concurs, except as to what is said of Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash Railroad Co., 206 Mo. 172, and adheres to his views expressed in Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Railroad Co., 240 Mo. l.c. 656; James T. Blair and David E.Blair, JJ., dissent from the ruling exempting the school district from special taxes, and concur in what is said concerning the liability of a county for such taxes; Walker,J., absent. *Page 466

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 267 S.W. 112, 305 Mo. 452

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 11/25/1924

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023