-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 2/2/1931
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/14/2017