Williams v. H. M.R.R. Co. , 105 N.J.L. 259 ( 1928 )


Menu:
  • The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

    For reversal — None. *Page 260

    [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] *Page 261

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 151 A. 486, 105 N.J.L. 259

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 10/15/1928

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/15/2017