-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, DONGES, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 6.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, PERSKIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 5.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 12 A.2d 890, 124 N.J.L. 561
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/2/1940
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023