-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 8.
For reversal — DONGES, PERSKIE, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 4.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 178 A. 793, 115 N.J.L. 203
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/17/1935
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023