-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 569
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 129 A. 922, 101 N.J.L. 568
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/18/1925
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023