Shore, Shirley Co. v. Kelley , 40 Ohio App. 3d 10 ( 1988 )

However outrageous the filing of the counterclaim was in this case, the element of seizure of property was not present. I would find this to be plain error and reverse, rather than affirm based on appellants' failure to object to the court's charge. The plain error doctrine is applicable to civil cases. Reichert v.Ingersoll (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 220, 18 OBR 281,480 N.E.2d 802.