-
The holding of the majority opinion is very narrow: Commercial Union waived the right to assert the affirmative defense of illegality because it did not raise the defense in its answer to the city's third-party complaint. Ante at 14-15.
I disagree with this conclusion, being of the opinion that R.C.
2305.31 and Buckeye Union Insurance Co. v. Zavarella Brothers Construction Co. (1997),121 Ohio App. 3d 147 , would render the contract void ab initio, and that we should not apply the waiver rule to give vitality to an otherwise void contract. Obviously, I disagree with the discussion in pages 16-56 of the majority opinion. I am compelled to point out that the majority's discussion is dicta in its purest form, being wholly unnecessary to the very narrow point of law — the waiver issue — that forms the basis for the majority's resolution of the case. *Page 44
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 75655.
Citation Numbers: 757 N.E.2d 50, 143 Ohio App. 3d 13
Judges: KARPINSKI, P.J.:
Filed Date: 8/13/2001
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023