Blair v. Boye-Doe , 157 Ohio App. 3d 17 ( 2004 )

{¶ 22} A court must hold an evidentiary hearing if the motion contains enough specificity to support the GTE test. Landmark Am. v. Overholt (July 12, 2000), 9th Dist. No. 3036-M, 2000 WL 961299. Here, appellant's motion contained sufficient operative facts to require a hearing to flush out further the facts of the case.