Automobile Banking Corp. v. W'msp't Nat. Bk. , 336 Pa. 298 ( 1939 )

We adopt the opinion of the court below, which concludes: "Because we believe that this case is not free from doubt, and that there should be a broad inquiry into the facts, the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is discharged . . ."

Order affirmed.