eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Araiza v. State , 99 Tex. Crim. 305 ( 1925 )

Menu:

The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Leave a Comment

Document Info

Docket Number： No. 9263.

Citation Numbers： 268 S.W. 941, 99 Tex. Crim. 305

Judges： MORROW, PRESIDING JUDGE. —

Filed Date： 2/18/1925

Precedential Status： Precedential

Modified Date： 1/13/2023

Cited By (17)

Odell v. Hudspeth , 189 F.2d 300 ( 1951 )

DeWolf v. State , 245 P.2d 107 ( 1952 )

Mouton v. State , 235 S.W.2d 645 ( 1950 )

Moore v. State , 535 S.W.2d 357 ( 1976 )

Walthall v. State , 505 S.W.2d 898 ( 1974 )

Brown v. State , 877 S.W.2d 869 ( 1994 )

Morris v. State , 382 S.W.2d 259 ( 1964 )

Marquez v. State , 725 S.W.2d 217 ( 1987 )

Culverhouse v. State , 755 S.W.2d 856 ( 1988 )

Clark v. State , 398 S.W.2d 763 ( 1966 )

Clark v. State , 717 S.W.2d 910 ( 1986 )

Ex Parte Slaton , 484 S.W.2d 102 ( 1972 )

Lucas v. State , 791 S.W.2d 35 ( 1989 )

Stanley v. State , 120 Tex. Crim. 450 ( 1932 )

Millikin v. Jeffrey, District Judge , 108 Tex. Crim. 84 ( 1927 )

Adamson v. State , 113 Tex. Crim. 335 ( 1929 )

Hardin v. Estelle , 365 F. Supp. 39 ( 1973 )

View All Citing Opinions »