Green v. State , 2017 Ark. 243 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     Cite as 
    2017 Ark. 243
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
    No.   CR-99-126
    CHARLES GREEN                                    Opinion Delivered September 14, 2017
    PETITIONER
    PRO SE MOTION FOR TRIAL
    V.                            TRANSCRIPT UNDER
    ARKANSAS RULE OF APPELLATE
    STATE OF ARKANSAS            PROCEDURE–CRIMINAL 19
    RESPONDENT [MISSISSIPPI COUNTY CIRCUIT
    COURT, CHICKASAWBA
    DISTRICT, NO. 47BCR-97-86]
    RESPONSE ORDERED.
    COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Associate Justice
    Petitioner Charles Green requests that he be provided with a copy of his trial record
    filed on appeal. No response has been filed to Green’s motion under Arkansas Rule of
    Appellate Procedure–Criminal 19 (2016), and we therefore direct Thomas A. Young, who
    represented Green on appeal, to provide a response in accord with this opinion.
    The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment reflecting petitioner Green’s
    conviction on a charge of first-degree murder. Green v. State, CR-99-126 (Ark. App. Sept.
    8, 1999) (unpublished) (original docket number CACR99-126). Green, who asserts that
    he is indigent, filed his motion for transcript in which he requests a copy of the trial record
    under Rule 19. In the motion, he indicates that he has requested a copy of the transcript
    and record from three attorneys who represented him and that he served those three
    attorneys with notice of the motion.
    Cite as 
    2017 Ark. 243
    Young is one of the three attorneys whom Green indicates he served, and he is listed
    on the docket for the court of appeals as the attorney who filed the record on appeal and
    represented Green throughout the appeal. See Ark. R. App. P.–Crim. 19(b). Young must
    respond even if he believes the motion has no merit, and Rule 19 makes counsel’s response
    mandatory. Geatches v. State, 
    2016 Ark. 452
    , at 4, 
    505 S.W.3d 691
    , 693. Accordingly, we
    direct Young to file the response required by Rule 19. He must state (1) whether he has
    the requested copy in his possession; (2) whether, if so, the copy is paper or some other
    format; (3) whether the copy was provided to his client. See Ark. R. App. P.–Crim. 19(b).
    If Young’s response states that he has a copy in his possession, but he has not provided it to
    his client, then the response must also either commit to provide the requested documents
    or provide good cause for the failure to do so. See Ark. R. App. P.–Crim. 19. Young’s
    response must be received within ten days of this opinion. After we have received Young’s
    response, we will address Green’s request that he be provided a copy of the transcript at
    State expense.
    Response ordered.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-99-126

Citation Numbers: 2017 Ark. 243

Judges: Courtney Hudson Goodson

Filed Date: 9/14/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/7/2019