Deshotels v. White , 226 So. 3d 1211 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • McDONALD, J.

    Concurring:

    hi concur and write separately to state my belief that the trial court’s imposition of the maximum statutory penalty of $100 per day was excessive in this case, when compared to a case where the records custodian does not respond at all. However, as pointed out in footnote 12 of the majority opinion, the defendants did not seek review of the amount of the penalty assessed per day; thus, the amount cannot be changed on appeal.

Document Info

Docket Number: 2016 CA 0889

Citation Numbers: 226 So. 3d 1211

Judges: Chutz, Crain, Guidry, Higginbotham, McClendon, McDonald, Penzato, Pettigrew, Theriot, Welch, Whipple

Filed Date: 8/16/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2021