raymond-herschel-johnson-sr-v-jack-cowley-warden-of-joseph-harps , 872 F.2d 342 ( 1989 )


Menu:
  • 872 F.2d 342

    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Jack COWLEY, Warden, of Joseph Harp's Correctional Center,
    et al., Respondent- Appellee.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF
    OKLAHOMA, Respondent.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Jack COWLEY, Warden; Unknown Named Warden of Jess Dunn
    Correctional Center; Gary Maynard, Director for
    the Oklahoma Department of Corrections,
    Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Jack COWLEY, Warden, Respondent.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA; Secretary of Health and Human Services,
    Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Jack COWLEY, Warden, Joseph Harp Correctional Center; Gary
    Maynard, Director, Oklahoma Department of
    Corrections; State of Oklahoma,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Sam PRESTON, Unit Manager; Jack Cowley, Warden, Joseph Harp
    Correctional Center, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Jack COWLEY; Joann Shepard, Health Administrator; D.
    Bradley, Dental Assistant; Dr. R.L. Warren,
    Dentist, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Jack COWLEY, Warden; Gary Maynard, Director, D.O.C.; Henry
    Bellmon, Oklahoma State Governor; Robert Macy, District
    Attorney; Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board Members;
    Clarence Harkins, Jr.; Augusta E. Mann, Marzee Douglass,
    Carl B. Hamm, Farrell Hatch, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA; William F. Yeager, Warden; Gary F.
    Maynard, Director for the Oklahoma Department of
    Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Bernie BISHOP, Principal and Leisure Library Supervisor;
    Janice Brewer, Law Librarian, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Bernie BISHOP, Supervisor; William F. Yeager, Warden, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    William F. YEAGER, Warden; John Wilson, Unit Manager;
    Sergeant Wheats, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    William F. YEAGER, Warden; John S. Wilson, Unit Manager;
    G.D. Lowe, Property- Officer, Respondents.
    Raymond Herschel JOHNSON, Sr., Petitioner,
    v.
    Mark SHIPMAN, Correctional Case Manager 2CD, Respondent.

    Nos. 87-8065, 87-8070, 88-8001, 88-8017, 88-8027, 88-8039,
    88-8040, 88-8077, 88-8085, 89-505, 89-511, 89-512,
    89-513, 89-515 and 89-516.

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Tenth Circuit.

    April 11, 1989.

    ORDER

    Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

    1

    By these cases, commenced in the court's original jurisdiction, petitioner alleges numerous petty grievances against prison officials. In each case, petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

    2

    The underlying pleadings are vague, rambling, replete with legalistic jargon, and characteristic of numerous papers filed previously by petitioner in other cases. Since 1980, petitioner has commenced fifty-four cases in the court's original jurisdiction, in addition to some thirty-three appeals he has filed (See Appendix A).

    3

    The subject matter of these cases is conspicuously inappropriate for this court's original jurisdiction. For that reason they are frivolous. Those who invoke the court's jurisdiction are charged with both the knowledge of the limits of that jurisdiction and the rules of procedure. We conclude that petitioner has long engaged in a pattern of litigation activity which is manifestly abusive. Appropriate restriction on a litigant's ability to commence abusive litigation in forma pauperis is within the inherent powers of the court. In re McDonald, --- U.S. ----, 109 S. Ct. 993, 103 L. Ed. 2d 158 (1989); Cotner v. Hopkins, 795 F.2d 900 (10th Cir.1986).

    4

    Because petitioner has repeatedly abused the original jurisdiction of this court, we direct the clerk not to accept further petitions from petitioner for extraordinary writs which allege only grievances against prison officials unless the required docketing fee is paid and all other rules of procedure have been satisfied.

    5

    It is further ordered that petitioner will be allowed fifteen days from the date of this order to pay the required filing fee in each of the above cases. If petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee within the time allowed, these cases will be dismissed without further notice.

    6
    APPENDIX A
    Termination      Case Nos.  Opposing Party       Case Type          Disposition
    Date
    08/15/80         801596    Meachum              Appeal             Dismissed
    02/26/81         801034    Parke                Appeal             Reversed
    05/04/83         822377    Leo                  Appeal             Affirmed
    02/16/84         832631    Murphy, Warden       Appeal             Dismissed
    03/15/84         848006/   West, Warden         Mandamus           Denied
    841355
    09/27/84         848039    U.S. Social          Mandamus           Denied
    Security
    11/01/84         841692    Gobel                Appeal             Affirmed
    11/14/84         848049/   USDCWD/Okla.        Mandamus           Denied
    84/2576
    11/27/84         841466    Franklin             Appeal             Dismissed
    03/04/85         842143    Brewer               Appeal             Affirmed
    03/06/85         842364    Richards             Appeal             Affirmed
    04/10/85         858010/   Brown, Warden        Mandamus           Denied
    851534
    07/10/85         841673    Angelone             Appeal             Dismissed
    07/12/85         858021/   West, Warden         Mandamus           Denied
    852033
    08/26/85         858047/   USDCWD/Okla.        Mandamus           Denied
    852276
    10/01/85         858040/   Brown, Warden        Mandamus           Denied
    852451
    10/25/85         851827    Brown, Warden        Appeal             Dismissed
    11/25/85         851820    Kirkpatrick          Appeal             Dismissed
    12/06/85         842153    McDaniel             Appeal             Affirmed
    02/24/86         852449    Brown, Warden        Appeal             Dismissed
    04/02/86         868018/   WD/Okla.             Mandamus           Denied
    861502
    04/14/86         868020/   WD/Okla.             Mandamus           Denied
    861565
    04/25/86         851762    Unknown Proprietor   Appeal             Affirmed
    04/25/86         868025/   Secretary of HHS     Mandamus           Denied
    861575
    05/30/86         868040/   Barton               Mandamus           Denied
    861804
    06/02/86         868031/   Maynard, Warden      Mandamus           Denied
    861816
    06/02/86         868032/   Douglas, Warden      Mandamus           Denied
    861818
    06/02/86         868036/   USDC WD/Okla.        Mandamus           Denied
    861814
    06/20/86         868045/   USDC WD/Okla.        Mandamus           Denied
    861920
    06/27/86         868046/   Douglas, Warden      Mandamus           Denied
    861952
    07/21/86         841162    Barnes               Appeal             Affirmed
    07/21/86         842558    Rolland              Appeal             Affirmed
    08/08/86         868039/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    862178
    08/11/86         868055/   Warden               Mandamus           Denied
    862183
    08/11/86         868041/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    862181
    09/11/86         861812    Shillinger           Appeal             Dismissed
    09/18/86         868071/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    862379
    09/18/86         868076/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    862383
    09/26/86         868072/   Okla.  Dept/Correct.  Mandamus           Denied
    862416
    10/22/86         852206    Brown, Warden        Appeal             Affirmed
    10/24/86         852627    Naman                Appeal             Affirmed
    10/30/86         868080/   Williams (really     Mandamus/Prohibi-  Denied
    tion
    862582    Johnson) v. Miller
    11/03/86         868088/   Maynard, Warden      Mandamus/Prohibi-  Denied
    tion
    862592
    11/03/86         862592    Maynard              Mandamus           Denied
    11/05/86         868086/   State of Oklahoma    Mandamus           Denied
    862605
    11/25/86         868101/   Maynard, Warden      Prohibition/Habe-  Denied
    as
    862714                         Corpus
    12/05/86         868092/   Both Oklahomas       Mandamus           Denied
    862776
    12/15/86         868099/   Maynard, Warden      Mandamus/Prohibi-  Denied
    tion/
    862813                         Habeas Corpus
    01/05/87         868109/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    871000
    01/14/87         868114/   Oklahoma Department  Mandamus           Denied
    871061
    01/14/87         868124    USDC                 Mandamus           Dismissed
    02/25/87         862644    Shillinger           Appeal             Dismissed
    03/23/87         862256    Chadwick             Appeal             Dismissed
    03/25/87         878016    State of Oklahoma    Habeas Corpus      Fee Paid
    06/16/87         862726    Meachum              Appeal             Affirmed
    06/29/87         862831    Hill                 Appeal             Dismissed
    08/07/87         878039    Saffle               Mandamus           Denied
    08/26/87         862739    Shillinger           Appeal             Affirmed
    10/08/87         878027/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    872463
    10/21/87         878045/   USDC                 Mandamus           Denied
    882627
    10/22/87         862751    Shillinger           Appeal             Dismissed
    10/28/87         878044/   Gray                 Mandamus           Denied
    872583
    10/29/87         872584    Oklahoma Department  Appeal             Dismissed
    10/29/87         878021/   Oklahoma Department  Prohibition        Denied
    872015
    10/29/87         862366    Hartless             Appeal             Dismissed
    12/17/87         872012    Oklahoma Department  Appeal             Dismissed
    03/22/88         881407    USDC                 Prohibition        Denied
    04/13/88         872654    Warren               Appeal             Dismissed
    04/28/88         872656    Bynum                Appeal             Dismissed
    04/28/88         871199    Sup.  Ct. of Wyoming  Appeal             Affirmed
    08/26/88         872550    Gorman               Appeal             Dismissed
    12/27/88         881933    Cowley               Appeal             Affirmed
    Cases Pending (March 8, 1989):
    878065    Cowley               Habeas Corpus
    878070    USDC                 Mandamus
    888001    Cowley               Mandamus
    888017    Cowley               Mandamus
    888027    State of Oklahoma    Mandamus
    888039    Cowley               Mandamus
    888040    Preston              Mandamus
    888077    Cowley               Mandamus
    888085    Cowley               Mandamus
    89505     State of Oklahoma    Habeas Corpus
    89511     Bishop               Prohibition
    89512     Bishop               Prohibition
    89513     Yeager               Prohibition
    89515     Yeager               Habeas Corpus
    89516     Shipman              Prohibition