State v. Echols , 32 S.W.3d 623 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Appellant Echols appeals from his conviction for first-degree murder. In his sole point on appeal, Echols argues that because the court deleted a portion of his videotaped confession, the jury was unable to assess his mental state and thus he was denied his constitutional rights to due process and to present a defense. Affirmed, Rule 30.25(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. WD 57928

Citation Numbers: 32 S.W.3d 623

Judges: Lowenstein, Newton, Stith

Filed Date: 11/7/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/1/2021