Commonwealth ex rel. Nedzwecky v. Nedzwecky , 203 Pa. Super. 179 ( 1964 )

Dissenting Opinion by

Ervin, J.:

I continue to believe that a man should be permitted to prove by conclusive evidence that he is not the father of a child he is asked to support. The blood test permitted in this case as to one child excluded the appellant. To deny him the opportunity to offer such proof as to the other child is unjust. I dissent.