James v. Crownover , 3 Sadler 73 ( 1886 )

Per Curiam:

There was no error in the refusal of the court to strike this judgment from the record. The note upon which it was entered contains an express confession of judgment. Not only did attorneys for the maker of the note appear and confess judgment against him, but the prothonotary also entered judgment on the note against him.

The record showed no such defect or error as to require the court to strike off the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.