-
Per Curiam, We are all of opinion that the sixth section of the Act of May 16,1891, P. L. 75, was correctly construed by the learned judge of the court below, and hence there was no error in striking off the appeal because it was not taken and filed within the time prescribed by said act. To have held otherwise would have been an attempted judicial amendment of the act in question.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 140
Citation Numbers: 191 Pa. 472
Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, Mitchell, Sterrett
Filed Date: 5/15/1899
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/17/2022