Reist v. Reist , 200 Pa. 317 ( 1901 )

Pee Curiam,

The plaintiff asked the court to decline to submit the case to the jury but to reinstate the judgment with full force and effect, less amount realized at the sheriff’s sale, to wit: $58.77. The court refused this point. The judgment was opened by the court on testimony deemed sufficient, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $158.67. We cannot say that it was error to open the judgment and we therefore affirm it.

Judgment affirmed.