Pepper v. Deakyne , 212 Pa. 187 ( 1905 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    The questions presented by this appeal were decided in Pepper v. Deakyne, ante, p. 181. Both appeals are from the *188same order confirming the report of an auditor appointed to award distribution of money paid by purchasers at a sheriff’s sale, and the rule governing them is the same.

    The decree is reversed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the chief justice in No. 147.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2; Appeal, No. 55

Citation Numbers: 212 Pa. 187

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Potter

Filed Date: 5/22/1905

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/17/2022