-
Per Curiam, The questions presented by this appeal were decided in Pepper v. Deakyne, ante, p. 181. Both appeals are from the
*188 same order confirming the report of an auditor appointed to award distribution of money paid by purchasers at a sheriff’s sale, and the rule governing them is the same.The decree is reversed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the chief justice in No. 147.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 2; Appeal, No. 55
Citation Numbers: 212 Pa. 187
Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Potter
Filed Date: 5/22/1905
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/17/2022