Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp. , 279 Pa. 123 ( 1924 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense, *124and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.

    We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262.

    The orders appealed from are affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 174 and 175

Citation Numbers: 279 Pa. 123

Judges: Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Sadler, Schaffer, Simpson, Walking

Filed Date: 1/7/1924

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/17/2022