Commonwealth v. James , 450 Pa. 52 ( 1972 )

Opinion

per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed. See, Commonwealth v. Ponton, 450 Pa. 40, 299 A. 2d 634 (1972).

Mr. Justice O’Brien, Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Nix dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice O’Brien’s dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Ponton, 450 Pa. 40, 299 A. 2d 634 (1972).