-
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM. The Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.
JONES, EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. *89 POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Document Info
Docket Number： Appeal Nos. 457 and 516
Citation Numbers： 463 Pa. 88, 343 A.2d 355
Judges： Brien, Consideration, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Remand, Roberts, Sentence, Trial, Would
Filed Date： 7/7/1975
Precedential Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 2/17/2022