Dundore v. Hollman , 2 Pennyp. 480 ( 1882 )

— Per .Curiam:

The evidence offered was clearly inadmissible. To say, not that Hollman was present when the transaction took place, but that he was within hearing distance, was altogether too vague. Besides, the suit was still in the name of l^ie administrators, although the Court allowed the appearance and plea to be withdrawn, and as Hollman could not be a witness, Mrs. Herrold was also incompetent.

Judgment affirmed.