United States v. Williams-El ( 1998 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6668
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY SINCLAIR WILLIAMS-EL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-6775
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY SINCLAIR WILLIAMS-EL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-83)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Sinclair Williams-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley,
III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In No. 98-6668, Larry Sinclair Williams-El appeals the dis-
trict court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence,
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (1994). In No. 98-6775, Williams-El appeals
from the denial of his motion challenging the $50 assessment
imposed as part of his sentence and also challenging the consec-
utive supervised release terms. Our review of the records and the
district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Williams-El, No. CR-92-83 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14 & May 4,
1998). We deny the motion to stay and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
3