Commonwealth v. Reiss , 672 A.2d 784 ( 1996 )

Menu:

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
NIX, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
*785FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and NIGRO, JJ., would reverse the order of the Superior Court.

Document Info

Citation Numbers： 672 A.2d 784

Judges： Cappy, Castille, Consideration, Flaherty, Newman, Nigro, Nix, Zappala

Filed Date： 3/18/1996

Precedential Status： Precedential

Modified Date： 9/24/2021