Pocono Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission , 158 Pa. Commw. 41 ( 1993 )


Menu:
  • McGINLEY, Judge,

    concurring and dissenting.

    I concur with the well-reasoned rationale of the majority and write this dissent only to state my disagreement with the remand. Clearly the Commission violated Pocono’s due process rights and I do not believe we should approve or salvage any part of the procedure utilized in this case. I would simply reverse.

Document Info

Docket Number: 996 C.D. 1992

Citation Numbers: 630 A.2d 971, 158 Pa. Commw. 41

Judges: McGinley and Smith, Jj., and Silvestri, Senior Judge

Filed Date: 8/19/1993

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/25/2023