T.E. Bold, Jr. v. Bureau of Driver Licensing ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
    Thomas E. Bold, Jr.                          :
    :
    v.                            :       No. 784 C.D. 2020
    :
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,                :
    Department of Transportation,                :
    Bureau of Driver Licensing,                  :
    Appellant                  :
    PER CURIAM
    CORRECTING ORDER
    AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2023, the Opinion in the above-captioned
    matter, filed on November 21, 2022, is corrected1 as follows:
    1
    As the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has explained:
    The law is clear that a court may modify or rescind any order
    within 30 days after its entry, if no appeal has been taken. [Section
    5505 of the Judicial Code,] 42 Pa. C.S. §5505; Pa.R.A.P. 1701(a).
    Thus, where a Notice of Appeal has been filed, the trial court cannot
    act further in the matter. However, this rule must be read in
    conjunction with a court’s inherent powers “to amend its records, to
    correct mistakes of the clerk or other officer of the court,
    inadvertencies of counsel, or supply defects or omissions in the
    record, even after the lapse of the term.” Commonwealth v. Cole,
    [
    263 A.2d 339
    , 341 (Pa. 1970)]; see also Commonwealth v. Rohrer,
    
    719 A.2d 1078
    , 1080 (Pa. Super. 1998); Commonwealth v. Quinlan,
    [
    639 A.2d 1235
    , 1239 (Pa. Super. 1994)]. For example, in Cole the
    court held that an order granting both a new trial and a motion in
    arrest of judgment was patently erroneous as such relief was
    irreconcilable. This [C]ourt concluded that the lower court had an
    inherent power to correct such obvious and patent mistakes beyond
    the expiration of the thirty-day statutory limit. Cole, 263 A.2d at
    341. Thus, under limited circumstances, even where the court
    would normally be divested of jurisdiction, a court may have the
    power to correct patent and obvious mistakes.
    Commonwealth v. Klein, 
    781 A.2d 1133
    , 1135 (Pa. 2001).
    1. Page 13 of the Majority Opinion is amended to reflect the deletion of
    “Judge McCullough dissents.” and “Judge Fizzano Cannon dissents.”
    2. Page 12 of the Dissenting Opinion is amended to reflect the addition
    of “Judge McCullough and Judge Fizzano Cannon join in the dissent.”
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 784 C.D. 2020

Judges: PER CURIAM

Filed Date: 6/8/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/8/2023