United States v. Nance ( 1998 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT LEROY NANCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior
District Judge. (CR-88-222, CA-97-385-3)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Leroy Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Michelle Lecocq, Michael
Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Leroy Nance appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommenda-
tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Nance, Nos. CR-88-222; CA-97-385-3 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 26,
1998). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S.
June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We accordingly deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2