-
Per Curiam, It is considered by the majority of the judges who heard this case that the defendant’s request for binding instructions and its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, were properly refused for the reasons given by the learned trial judge in his opinion refusing the latter motion.
Judgment is affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 200
Citation Numbers: 41 Pa. Super. 298
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Porter, Rice
Filed Date: 12/13/1909
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2022