Hess v. Kemmerer , 65 Pa. Super. 247 ( 1916 )

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The painstaking analysis of the testimony by the trial judge, and his application of decided cases to the undisputed facts in overruling the defendant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto, make it unnecessary to further review this case, and for the reasons given in his opinion, the judgment is affirmed.