Archer v. Davis , 77 Pa. Super. 513 ( 1921 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    Every disputed question of fact in this controversy was fully and clearly submitted to the jury and the legal *515propositions involved were correctly decided by the trial judge. After a careful examination of the record we do not find any reversible error therein.

    The judgment is affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 157

Citation Numbers: 77 Pa. Super. 513

Judges: Head, Hendebson, Kellee, Linn, Oblady, Pobteb, Tbexleb

Filed Date: 11/21/1921

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2022