United States v. Hill ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7516
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RODNEY L. HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-95-39-A, CA-97-695-AM)
Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999
Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Peter Buda, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Thomas More
Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Rodney L. Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the
motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hill,
Nos. CR-95-39-A; CA-97-695-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2