United States v. Kaylan Bell , 473 F. App'x 623 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                MAY 21 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          No. 11-30146
    Plaintiff - Appellee,               D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00156-BLW
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    KAYLAN JAY BELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Idaho
    B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding
    Submitted May 15, 2012 **
    Before:        CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Kaylan Jay Bell appeals from the 42-month sentence imposed following his
    guilty-plea conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18
    U.S.C. § 2250(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s
    request for oral argument is denied.
    Bell contends that the district court erred under Tapia v. United States, 
    131 S. Ct. 2382
     (2011), by selecting his sentence on the basis of his need for
    rehabilitation. Because Bell did not object on this basis before the district court,
    we review for plain error. See United States v. Tapia, 
    665 F.3d 1059
    , 1063 (9th
    Cir. 2011). We find none. The court selected Bell’s sentence out of concern for
    protecting society, rather than to promote rehabilitation. Moreover, Bell has not
    established that any error affected his substantial rights. See United States v.
    Waknine, 
    543 F.3d 546
    , 554 (9th Cir. 2008) (to establish plain error, a defendant
    must demonstrate “a reasonable probability that he would have received a different
    sentence” if the district court had not erred).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                      11-30146
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-30146

Citation Numbers: 473 F. App'x 623

Judges: Canby, Graber, Smith

Filed Date: 5/21/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023